Parluhutan Samosir’s online public complaint (dumas) report to Propam awaits immediate follow-up and correction.

progresifjaya.co.id, JAKARTA – A strange, seemingly humorous incident regarding the law occurred in Asahan Regency. It occurred in Hamlet VII, Rawang Pasar IV Village, Rawang Arga Panca District. A police report (LP) filed by the complainant, Merry Sibarani, was filed with the Asahan Police, with the accused being Parluhutan Samosir. The allegation was land deed forgery.

The police report was registered under Number LP/B/234/III/SPKT/POLRES ASAHAN/POLDA SUMATERA UTARA on March 10, 2026. Less than a month later, an Investigation Order Number SP.Sidik/116/IV/RES.1.9/2026/Reskrim dated April 8, 2026, was suddenly issued. Simultaneously, an Investigation Task Order Number Sp. Gas Sidik/502/IV/RES.1.9/2026/Reskrim dated April 8, 2026.

Regarding this matter, the accused, Parluhutan Samosir told the author, that he greatly respects the ongoing legal process. However, he said, the process must be carried out correctly based on the provisions of Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP 2025).

“The provisions of the 2025 KUHAP clearly stipulate that the first step an investigator must take is to conduct an investigation. This phase is to identify and identify events suspected of being a crime in order to determine whether or not the reported case can be escalated to an investigation,” Parluhutan Samosir explained on Tuesday, April 21, 2026.

“Well, in the context of my case as the accused, the provisions of the 2025 KUHAP have been violated. The police report was filed and immediately moved to an investigation without further investigation, such as clarification or confrontation,” he continued.

Meanwhile, regarding the accusation of falsifying land certificates as stated in the police report, Parluhutan admitted he was confused. Based on the civil ruling of the Kisaran District Court (PN) Panel of Judges, all evidence and witnesses presented by the plaintiff, who is also the complainant’s family member, were rejected. The judge reasoned that the plaintiff’s claims could not be proven because they were not supported by valid and sufficient documentary evidence.

“Let’s just use common sense. If the judge has rejected the evidence presented, why is the Polres of Asahan Criminal Investigation Unit escalating Merry Sibarani’s case to an investigation? What is the legal basis for that? Even an investigation requires at least two pieces of valid evidence to escalate the case to an investigation,” Parluhutan explained angrily.

He also stated, that the Kisaran District Court’s final decision is actually the same case as the one being investigated by the Polres of Asahan Criminal Investigation Unit. The only difference is that in the Kisaran District Court, the case is civil, while in the Polres of Asahan Criminal Investigation Unit, it is criminal. Furthermore, the plaintiff and complainant are only related by name, but they are of the same blood.

Regarding this flawed legal process, Parluhutan admitted to having filed an online public complaint (dumas) through the website yanduan.propam.polri.go.id. The report is registered under number 260417000056 and with the complaint code 5617MUXK, dated April 17, 2026.

He hopes, that through this dumas, the Polda of the North Sumatera’s Propam will immediately intervene to investigate the ‘strange’ personnel working in the Polres of Asahan Criminal Investigation Unit, including its leaders.

“Hopefully, the internal corruption within the Polres of Asahan Criminal Investigation Unit, which handled the case without further investigation, will be immediately addressed. The Kisaran District Court has already decided the civil case, but now they’re trying to manipulate it into a criminal case. It’s also offside,” he said, annoyed but hopeful.

Writer/Editor: Bembo